Historians devote their lives to understanding the past, so one would surmise that they, above all others, would be drawn to the theory of originalism. One might attribute the resolute anti-originalism of most historians to the fact that they are generally more liberal than the population at large and thus oppose originalism for political reasons. Although political orientation may account for some of this animus, their hostility to originalism has less to do with politics and more to do with questions of historical interpretation and method. When most historians look closely at originalist arguments, what they usually find is bad history shaped to fit an ideological agenda—what historians derisively call “law office history.”The author does a really fine job of destroying Yoo, of which activity there ought to be more.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
History Matters
For a very interesting discussion of why few historians take originalism serious see here. A key point
Labels:
history
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment