Yesterday, I watched this guy quiz Timothy Geitner on lot of things but one of them was why Geitner wasn't trying harder to get banks to absorb more of the losses associated with underwater homeowners. It actually took Silvers three tries before Geitner would even address the issue of lowering banks' profits. One weird exchange, it was. It seemed as though Geitner had no idea that lowering profits, as opposed to funding homeowner bailouts, was possible. Indeed, Geitner claimed that the government couldn't do a thing when it came to banks' profits; hands tied, not possible, he said. Why on earth would that be, one wonders? If what Geitner said was true, and Silver thought that it wasn't, it is almost as if the governments only power over banks is to give them money when they get drunk and blow it on hookers and bad drugs or mortgage backed securities, whichever comes first.
In any event, the whole thing is worth watching, if only for Geitner's cluelessness when it comes to effective regulation and the government's power to persuade.
No comments:
Post a Comment